Akademische Wissenschaftliche ZeitschriftenRoad to a better self – ethical guidance to AI in education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/kg.2025.1.06Schlagworte:
AIED, AI teacher, Human Teacher, Human Values and Relationships, Ethics and WellbeingAbstract
This article examines the ethical and practical implications of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), focusing on its impact on human values and relationships. While AI offers benefits such as personalized learning and improved academic outcomes, it also poses risks such as reduced critical thinking, over-reliance, and privacy concerns. The loss of creativity, embodied learning, and authentic human connection are highlighted as significant concerns. The role of the human teacher remains essential in fostering personal development and social-emotional learning. The FIRE initiative (Forum for the International Renewal of Education) aims to integrate ethics, well-being, and 21st-century skills into AI-based education. A central theme is the alignment of AI with core values such as empathy, resilience, and integrity. Ultimately, the article advocates for a human-centred approach where AI supports, rather than replaces human growth through community and relationships.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Bit D., Biswas S., Nag, M., The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Educational System, “International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology” 2024, Volume 11, Issue 4, p. 419–427 IJSRST2411424.pdf [Downloaded: 3 May 2025].
Vieriu A., M. Petrea, G., The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students, “Academic Development. Education Sciences” 2025, 15(3), p. 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 [Downloaded: 22 April 2025].
Holms W., Tuomi I., State of the art and practice in AI in education, “Eur J Educ” 2022, 57: 542–570. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12533 [Downloaded: 18 April 2025].
Gloviczky, A holnapután iskolája, Felkészülés az emberi jövőre, 2024.
Kiss O., “AI and Its Philosophy – Parallel Stories”, in: Szívós, Mihály (szerk.) Szanto, Tibor R. (szerk.), Knowledge, Controversy, Virtuality: Studies in honour of László Ropolyi on his 75th birthday, L’Harmattan, Hungarian Philosophical Socety, Budapest 2025, 170 p.
WEF Future of Job Report: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-futureof-jobs-report-2025/ [Downloaded: 15 January 2025].
DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH and DICASTERY FOR CUTURE AND EDUCATION (2025): ANTIQUA ET NOVA Note on the Relationship BetweenArtificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250128_antiqua-et-nova_en.html [Downloaded: 3 May 2025].
U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology: Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations, Washington, DC, 2023. This report is available at: https://tech.ed.gov
Mitra S., The hole in the wall: self organising systems in education 2006: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50993473 [Downloaded: 5 May 2025].
Qadir J., Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education 2022: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366712815_Engineering_Education_in_the_Era_of_ChatGPT_Promise_and_Pitfalls_of_Generative_AI_for_Education [Downloaded: April 17 2025]. FIRE Manifesto (2017).
Petrova K., Nevarez M., Waldinger R., Schulz M., Emotional Support Across Adulthood: A 60-Year Study of Men’s Social Networks, “Psychology and Aing” 2024, No. 39(8), p. 933–945.
Root-Bernstein R., Root-Bernstein M., Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of creative people, Houghton, Mifflin and Company 1999.
Briedis M., Navarro M., Conceptual problems with disembodied cognition in learning environment(s) and the alternative of embodied creativity, “Creativity Studies” 2024, 17(1), p. 244–253; https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2024.20755.
