Schulzowska „teoria obrazu” w interpretacji Anny Juraschek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2020.15.14Słowa kluczowe:
Bruno Schulz, Walter Benjamin, mimesis, filozofia obrazu, Xięga bałwochwalczaAbstrakt
The article is a review of and a discussion with the recent monograph by Anna Juraschek, Die Rettung des Bildes im Wort. Bruno Schulz’ Bild-Idee in seinem prosaischen und bildnerischen Werk, Göttingen 2016. Juraschek has put forward the following thesis: alongside his own specific philosophy of language expressed in his narrative works and essays, Bruno Schulz also suggests a particular philosophy of image/picture, which he develops in his visual art. This “program” is not specified and may be reconstructed only by interpreting his graphic works; it is, however, corroborated by the poetics of Schulz’ stories. Juraschek regards the “word” and the “image” in Schulz as artistic entities, and emphasizes the visual nature of his fiction and the narrative qualities of his graphic works. She points at Schulz’s crossing of the boundaries between different arts and claims that the writer criticizes the very notion of mimesis (a statement that, according to the reviewer, may be questioned). Juraschek tries to reconstruct the main sources inspiring Schulz’s idea of image/picture: the classic European painting, German literature (i.e. Leopold von Sacher-Masoch and Joseph von Eichendorff), as well as German philosophers and cultural critics such as Walter Benjamin. According to the reviewer, there are three points that Juraschek’s study can contribute to Schulz studies. First, the German scholar succeeds in systematizing different kinds of verbo-visual relations and interactions in Schulz’s oeuvre. Second, she fully appreciates his graphic work which thus far seems to have been undervalued, especially by Polish scholars. Last but not least, Juraschek brings to the fore some striking affinities between the ideas of Schulz and those of Walter Benjamin. As a possible background of interpreting Schulz, the philosophical writings of Benjamin are a context which certainly deserves more investigation.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Augsburger Janis. 2008. Masochismen. Mythologisierung als Krisen-Ästhetik bei Bruno Schulz. Hannover: Wehrhahn.
Benjamin Walter. 2005. Pasaże. Tłum. I. Kania. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Bieniek Beata A. 2011. Bruno Schulz’ Mythopoesie der Geschlechteridentitäten: Der Götzenblick im Gender-Spiegel. München–Berlin: Sagner (wyd. 2: 2018. Berlin: Frank & Timme).
Caneppele Paolo. 2010. Die Republik der Träume. Bruno Schulz und seine Bilderwelt. Graz: Clio.
van Heuckelom Kris. Artistic Crossover in Polish Modernism. The Case of Bruno Schulz’s Xięga Bałwochwalcza (The Idolatrous Booke): http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/iconoclasm/heuckelom.htm.
Juraschek Anna. 2016. Die Rettung des Bildes im Wort. Bruno Schulz’ Bild-Idee in seinem prosaischen und bildnerischen Werk. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Kato Ariko. 2010. „Obraz i Księga. O autoreferencyjności w twórczości Brunona Schulza”. W: Białe plamy w SCHULZologii. Pod red. Małgorzaty Kitowskiej-Łysiak. Lublin: KUL.
Lipszyc Adam. 2011. Rewizja procesu Józefiny K. i inne lektury od zera. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
Sass Joanna. 2019. „Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Wiedniu” i „Uchodźca”. W: Schulz. Słownik mówiony. Pod red. Marcina Całbeckiego i Piotra Millatiego. Gdańsk: Fundacja Terytoria Książki.
Tokarzewska Monika. 2010. „Bruno Schulz i Walter Benjamin: Między zachodnioeuropejską metropolią a środkowoeuropejską prowincją”. Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki 3/28 (2010).
Underhill Karen. 2011. Bruno Schulz and Jewish Modernity. Chicago: https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/876476075.html?FMT=ABS.