Jerzy Ficowski on Schulz – Between Reconstruction and Rhetoric (Reflections on Regions of the Great Heresy)

Autor

  • Jerzy Kandziora Polish Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2024.s.04

Abstrakt

According to the title, the author makes an attempt to reconstruct and analyze the rhetoric of Jerzy Ficowski’s works on Schulz. Since rhetoric is understood here as a way of articulating the text, in many cases it overlaps with poetics. The author’s intention is to approach Regions of Great Heresy as a careful reader of both Schulz and Ficowski to show ideological and stylistic affinities between them. An important part of the essay are many statements by Ficowski himself, drawn from his private correspondence (including letters sent to Schulz) and poetry (particularly his first book of poems, Lead Soldiers of 1948, very significant in the context of his Schulz studies). Supplemented by Kandziora’s commentary, Ficowski’s statements shed new light on the methods of critical research on an author whose biography is incomplete, while his manuscripts, letters, and works of art. have been either destroyed or scattered. Thus, Ficowski alternates biography and interpretation, trying to reintegrate the entire output of Schulz. The essay belongs to a research project supported by Narodowe Centrum Nauki.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Biogram autora

Jerzy Kandziora - Polish Academy of Sciences

Professor Emeritus at the Institute of Literary Studies of Polish Academy of Sciences, literary historian, bibliographer, editor, and documentalist. He has published books onPolish fiction after 1976, Stanisław Barańczak, and Jerzy Ficowski, as well as Polish underground literature, publishing, and theater in 1976-1989. Besides, he has edited a collection of letters, memories, and statements on Bruno Schulz and published several articles in Schulz/Forum.

Opublikowane

2024-02-18

Jak cytować

Kandziora, J. (2024). Jerzy Ficowski on Schulz – Between Reconstruction and Rhetoric (Reflections on Regions of the Great Heresy). Schulz/Forum, 83–113. https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2024.s.04