Academic Scientific JournalsPeer tutoring and peer feedback: Effective methods of support for students in the academic environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.05Keywords:
Masters of Didactics, peer tutoring, peer feedback, higher educationAbstract
This paper investigates the challenges faced by contemporary univer-sities and highlights the need for innovative educational strategies in response to social, cultural, and environmental changes. As the Inter-net shifts the role of educators from sole knowledge providers to facil-itators of student-centred learning, peer tutoring and peer feedback emerge as pivotal methods for enhancing academic success and per-sonal growth.
Central to this discussion are two case studies from the University of Groningen's Masters of Didactics program in 2022-2023, which il-lustrates a practical application of these strategies. The paper also re-views theoretical foundations of these methods, drawing on construc-tivist learning theories and Zone of Proximal Development. Key ele-ments for successful implementation of the strategies discussed in the case studies include trained tutors, well-informed students, struc-tured sessions, personalized support and continuous feedback. These characteristics not only enhance the learning experience but also cul-tivate essential interpersonal skills.
Our findings underscore the positive impact of integrating peer tu-toring and feedback on student engagement, collaboration, and aca-demic performance. This paper advocates for the widespread adoption of these pedagogical approaches in higher education, emphasizing their role in creating an inclusive and effective learning environment that prepares students for future academic and professional chal-lenges.
Downloads
References
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, Jane Sampson (2014). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning From and With Each Other. London: Routledge.
Cohen, Peter A., James A. Kulik, Chen-Lin C. Kulik (1982). “Educa-tional outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings”. American Educational Research Journal 19/2, 237–248.
Colvin, Janet W. (2007). “Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education”. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 15/2: 165–181.
Colvin, Janet W., Marinda Ashman (2010). “Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education”. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 18/2: 121–134.
Duran, David (2017). Learning-by-Teaching: Evidence and Implications as a Pedagogical Mechanism. London: Springer.
Falchikov, Nancy (2005). Improving Assessment through Student In-volvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Fur-ther Education. London: Routledge.
Falchikov, Nancy, Judy Goldfinch (2000). “Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks”. Review of Educational Research 70/3: 287–322.
Fosnot, Catherine Twomey (2005). Constructivism: Theory, Perspec-tives, and Practice. New York – London: Teachers College Press.
Fosnot, Catharine Twomey, Randall Stewart Perry (2005). “Construc-tivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning.” In: Catherine T. Fosnot (ed.), Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. 2nd ed. New York – London: Teachers College Press, 8–38.
Fuchs, Lynn S., Douglas Fuchs, Johnell Bentz, Norris B. Phillips, Carol L. Hamlett (1994). “The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience.” American Educational Research Journal 31/1: 75–103.
García, Elizabeth, Geoffrey L. Cohen (2012). “The role of tutoring in improving outcomes for underrepresented students in higher edu-cation”. Educational Research and Reviews 7/20: 432.
Gielen, Sarah, Elien Peeters, Filip Dochy, Patrick Onghena, Katrien Struyven (2010). “Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning”. Learning and Instruction 20/4: 304–315.
Gikandi, Joyce Wangui, Donna Morrow, Niki E. Davis (2011). “Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the litera-ture”. Computers & Education 57/4: 2333–2351.
Goodlad, Sinclair, Beverley Hirst (1989). Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching. New York: Nichols Publishing.
Hattie, John, Helen Timperley (2007). “The power of feedback”. Review of Educational Research 77/1: 81–112.
Lu, Ruiling, Linda Bol (2007). “A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback”. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6/2: 100–115.
Nicol, David (2010). “From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education”. Assessment & Eval-uation in Higher Education 35/5: 501–517.
Nicol, David, Debra Macfarlane-Dick (2006). “Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice”. Studies in Higher Education 31/2: 199–218.
Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, Caroline Breslin (2014). “Rethinking feed-back practices in higher education: A peer review perspective”. As-sessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39/1, 102–122.
Thompson, Blair, Joseph P. Mazer (2012). “Developmental education: Challenges and strategies for student success”. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 136: 1–10.
Topping, Keith J. (2009). “Peer assessment”. Theory Into Practice 48/1: 20–27.
Veiga Simão, Maria Assunção Flores, Sandra Fernandes, Célia Figue-ira (2008). “Tutoring in higher education: Concepts and practices”. Sísifo: Educational Sciences Journal 7: 73–86. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26572648_Tutoring_in_ higher_education_Concepts_and_practices. Accessed 30.06.2024.
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner, Gail Ross (1976). “The role of tutoring in problem solving”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17/2: 89–100.
