Montessori as an alternative in post-totalitarian and ‘folwark’ educational culture – ethnographical research report

Autor

  • Jarosław Jendza Uniwersytet Gdański

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2020.49.11

Słowa kluczowe:

Montessori, etnografia, kultura, kody kulturowe, edukacja alternatywna

Abstrakt

The article addresses the issue of alternative education in the context of cultural codes. On the basis of ethnographic research conducted in primary Montessori schools in Poland the author analyses the significance of local culture for the global range pedagogy, and in this way questions the thesis according to which Montessori is indifferent to cultural differences. The results of the research show, that all three cultural codes, including the totalitarian and folwark ones are present in many different situations investigated during the research. At the same time Polish Montessori schools are undoubtedly these places in which the modernization code is overwhelmingly present.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Andreassen P., Christensen M.K., Møller J.E. (2020), Focused ethnography as an approach in medical education research. “Medical Education”, 54.

Atkinson P. (1990), The Ethnographic Imagination: Textual Constructions of Reality. New York, Routledge.

Atkinson P., Coffey A., Delamont S. (1999), Ethnography: Post, past, and present. “Journal of Contemporary Ethnography”, 28(5).

Atkinson P., Hammersley M. (1994), Ethnography and participant observation. In: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Bateson G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. San Francisco, CA, Chandler.

Bednarczuk B., Zdybel D. (eds.) (2014), Learning in the Montessori Classroom – In Search of Quality in Education. Lublin, Wydawnictwo UMCS.

Bittner E. (1988), Realism in Field Research. In: R.M. Emerson (ed.), Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Prospect Heights, IL, Waveland.

Bourdieu P. (1988), Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

Bruner J.S. (1996), The Culture of Education. Cambridge MA, London, Harvard University Press.

Clifford J., Marcus G.E. (eds.) (1986), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Cossentino J. (2005), Ritualizing Expertise: A Non-Montessorian View of the Montessori Method. “American Journal of Education”, 111.

Denervaud S., Knebel J-F., Hagmann P., Gentaz E. (2019), Beyond executive functions, creativity skills benefit academic outcomes: Insights from Montessori education. “PLoS ONE” 14(11): e0225319, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225319, 2.04.2020.

Duffy M., Duffy N. (2012), Love of Learning. Supporting Intrinsic Motivation in Montessori Students. Santa Rosa, CA, Parent Child Press – A Division of Montessori Services.

Eddy M.D. (2016), The interactive notebook: How students learned to keep notes during the Scottish Enlightenment. “Book History”, 19(1).

Emerson R.M., Fretz R.I., Shaw L.L. (2011), Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago & London, The University of Chicago Press.

Eissler T. (2009), Montessori Madness! A Parent to Parent Argument for Montessori Education. Georgetown, TX, Sevenoff, LLC.

Erickson F. (1977), Some Approaches to Inquiry in School-Community Ethnography “Anthropology & Education Quarterly”, 8(2).

Fetterman D.M. (1998), Ethnography step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Freud S. (2001), A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-analysis. In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 17. London, Vintage.

Gawlicz K. (2009), Preschools Play with Power: Constructing the Child, the Teacher and the Preschool in Two Polish Childcare Institutions. Roskilde, Roskilde Universitet.

Geertz C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, Basic Books.

Goffman E. (1974), Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. London, Harper and Row.

Grazzini C. (2004), The Four Planes of Development. “NAMTA Journal”, 29(1).

Hall E.T. (1990), The Silent Language. New York, Doubleday.

Hall E.T., Hall Reed M. (1989), Understanding Cultural Differences. Yarmouth, Maine, Intercultural Press.

Hammersley M. (1992), What’s Wrong with Ethnography? London, Routledge.

Hammersley M., Atkinson P. (2007), Ethnography. Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London–New York, Routledge.

Hester S., Francis D. (2000), Ethnomethodology and Local Educational Order. In: Hester S., Francis D. (eds.), Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action.

Amsterdam, PA, John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Katan D. (1999), Translating Cultures. An introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester, St. Jerome Publishing.

Kluckhohn F., Strodtbeck F.L. (1961), Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL, Row, Petersen.

Klus-Stańska D. (2002), Konstruowanie wiedzy w szkole. Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie.

Klus-Stańska D. (2018), Paradygmaty dydaktyki. Myśleć teorią o praktyce. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Klus-Stańska D., Nowicka M. (2005), Sensy i bezsensy edukacji wczesnoszkolnej. Warszawa, WSiP.

Korczak J. (1924), Momenty wychowawcze. Nasza Księgarnia, Warszawa–Łódź.

Leder A. (2014), Prześniona rewolucja. Ćwiczenie z logiki historycznej. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Marshall Ch. (2017), Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. “Science of Learning”, 2(1).

Masschelein J., SimonsM. (2013), In Defence of the School: A Public Issue. Leuven, Education, Culture & Society Publishing.

Maxwell J.A. (2004), Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Mitchell K. (2006), Neoliberal Governmentality in the European Union: Education, Training, and Technologies of Citizenship. “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space”, 24(3).

Monorouxe L., Ajjawi R. (2020), Ethnography, methodology: Striving for clarity. “Medical Education”, 54(4).

Montessori M. (1912), The Montessori Method. New York, Frederick A. Strokes Company.

Montessori M. (1948), To Educate the Human Potential. Aydar, Madras, Kalakshetra Publications.

Montessori M. (1949), The Absorbent Mind. Adyar, Madras, The Theosophical Publishing House.

Montessori M. (1971), The Four Planes of Education. In: M.M. Montessori (ed.), Lectures given in Edinburgh, 1938, and London, 1939. “AMI Communications”, 4.

Montessori M. (1973), From Childhood to Adolescence. New York, Schocken.

Montessori M. (2008), The Child, Society and The World: Unpublished Speeches and Writings. Amsterdam, Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company.

Neuman W.L. (2006), Social Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. New York, Pearson.

Polanyi M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Potulicka E., Rutkowiak J. (2010), Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków, Impuls.

Prus R. (1996), Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Life Experience. Albany, NY, University of New York Press.

Prus R. (2005), Studying Human Knowing and Acting: The Interactionist Quest for Authenticity. In: D. Pawluch, W. Shaffir, Ch. Miall (eds.), Doing Ethnography. Studying Everyday Life. Toronto, Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Rancière J. (1991), The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Roper J.M., Shapira J. (2000), Ethnography in Nursing Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Rosaldo R. (1993), Culture & Truth. The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston, Beacon Press.

Said E.W. (1978), Orientalism. New York, Pantheon Books.

Said E.W. (1994), Culture and Imperialism. New York, Vintage Books.

Seldin T. (2017), How to Raise an Amazing Child the Montessori Way. 2nd ed. London, DK.

Shaffir W.B., Stebbins R.A., Turowetz A. (eds.) (1980), Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research. New York, St. Martin’s Press.

Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner Ch. (1997), Riding The Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Vlieghe J., Zamojski P. (2020), Entering the world with notes: Reclaiming the practices of lecturing and note making. “Educational Philosophy and Theory”, https://doi.org/10.1080/0031857.202 0.1743271.

Wall S. (2005), Focused Ethnography: A Methodological Adaptation for Social Research in Emerging Contexts. “Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, 16(1).

Wolcott H.F. (1999), Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press.

Woods P. (2005/1986), Inside Schools. Ethnography in educational research. London–New York, Routledge.

Zamojski P. (2017), Cultural codes and education in Poland – a plea for a new educational imaginary. “Policy Futures in Education”, 16(4).

Opublikowane

2020-06-17

Jak cytować

Jendza, J. (2020). Montessori as an alternative in post-totalitarian and ‘folwark’ educational culture – ethnographical research report. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 49(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2020.49.11

Numer

Dział

Rozprawy i artykuły

Inne teksty tego samego autora